by tavdy79 on 24 Jul 2006, 09:47
Just my ha'penn'orth:
I personally wasn't a victim of the security at any time, but I did see a few things that made me worried over the course of the weekend and I have heard of enough incidents that I'm sure the security were a major problem for many people - there have been concerns expressed on four different websites that I post/lurk on (Gladtalk, eFests, Festivalweather & Donstayin - copies of this post are on all four sites), and in each case discussion has been started by different people, confirming the idea that Security is an issue that needs to be adressed. It makes sense for us (as festival-goers) to have some kind of definable list of issues to present to the Glade organisers. If you disagree with what I say, then say so and make a suggestion. As I understand it, the complaints are as follows:
Complaint one: attitude towards role. From the POV of the festival-goers, Security should be there to make sure the festival runs smoothly, preventing any crimes or incidents occurring that cause (or are likely to cause) problems for festival-goers. That means their main priorities should be:
1. keeping out fencejumpers
2. ending and/or preventing incidents of violence
3. dealing with thieves
4. preventing accidents
In addition to this, they should be treating the festival-goers with respect and courtesy at all times (something the Security at Glade '05 got massively wrong). They should not be actively looking for drugs, since they would then be at loggerheads with all the festival goers, not just the troublemakers. Many drugs (MDMA, Cannabis, Ketamine etc) are likely to make their lives easier anyway, so it's counter-intuitive. Yes, Security have a legal obligation to deal with any drugs they come across, and so removing a spliff or line or whatever is not something we can complain about (even if we don't like it), but if they don't see drug use then they don't have any reason to act. From what's been said, a lot of the security went out looking for drug-users, and the only reason they can have had for that is because they were bored, wanted something to do, and/or went out the the intention of creating trouble. IMHO that means they aren't merely at fault, but they themselves became a threat to the festivalgoers by actively causing incidents of violence, the precise opposite of their role as defined above.
The second complaint is concerning their general conduct dealing with, and attitude towards, festival-goers. A few incidents I have heard of include:
1. restraining then stamping on the head of a man on a bad LSD trip
2. removing armbands without the permission of the owner and without consulting the Glade organisers (several incidents)
3. planting drugs on an individual, claiming they are a dealer, then throwing them out
4. financial theft - in the two incidents of which I am aware, a total of over £300 was taken, in both cases from people who Security claimed were dealing drugs (in reality they just had "personal use" quantities)
5. assaulting individuals who tried to prevent them from causing serious harm to others, invariably removing them from the site
6. verbally abusing a festival-goer who had been lying on the ground in a wide open space, doing absolutely nothing at all (other than communing with nature)
7. the assault on "skinny naked guy" in the main arena area, witness by dozens (if not hundreds) of people.
The general consensus seems to be that Security were over-keen on flexing their muscle, and had a tendency to abuse their authority. This is probably linked to issues raised in the first complaint, such as boredom.
The third complaint is their attitude towards health & safety. Driving around a site like Glade needs a lot more caution than normal given the number of munters walking round, yet even on the Thursday I saw them driving around the site too fast, while people were setting up camp. At that point in time people's reactions were likely to be good - but if they were driving the same on the Sunday and Monday, it is literally a miracle that someone did not get hurt or killed, especially if their driving skills were so poor they crashed into and knocked over a lamp-post at one point.
The fourth complaint is regarding the attitude of Security towards one of the major purposes of Glade, it's zeitgeist. I'm sure I'm not the only person who believes that Glade isn't just about enjoying good music (and very good food) - it's about the "vibe" of the festival - positive, friendly, loving, caring, reconciliatory & fun. Over the weekend I saw loads of examples of the zeitgeist in action. In one case, while dancing in the crowd at Origin, a friend of mine accidentlally hit another man in the eye as he was passing us. The man did not react angrily, but instead laughed and let my friend know that he held no grudge. They both chose to see the funny side of the situation, rather than have some kind of confrontation. Yet, as has already been established, certain Security men & women were actively trying to instigate violence on the part of festival-goers, actively trying to destroy the zeitgeist, largely for their own selfish reasons.
So, to summarise, the complaints are:
1. Security acted with blatant disregard for their role by actively encouraging violent incidents, the precise opposite of their reason for being there
2. Security acted with inappropriately towards festival-goers, with blatant disregard towards their right to be treated with respect and common courtesy
3. Security acted with blatant disregard for health & safety, endangering the safety and lives of festival-goers, stewards and others
4. Security acted with blatant disregard for the zeitgeist of the festival
Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs
--- Sister Anni Coque l'Doo, Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, San Francisco Order