Sperge wrote:There does seem to be a growing national mood of resentment towards the country's level of taxation
It's not that much different from elsewhere in Europe. Fact, it costs a fuckload of money to keep a capitalist country with a free health service running well, and (IMO) it is.
[blather]Sperge, the problems with the government that you're citing seem to be centred around the government's perceived attitude, not their ability. And you can't guess what someone's attitude is, but you can judge them on their actions. Brown does seem a bit lost but he doesn't really have any crises to deal with. We might well have an economic one coming very soon, if the worst predictions are acccurate, but if it doesn't happen, will you thank Brown or just continue to foretell impending doom? If the Tories take over before it happens, they will certainly lay the blame squarely on Labour's shoulders.[/blather]
It doesn't help when they invade other countries for very little or no gain. (OK there's a very good reason not to vote Labour but it didn't seem to help much last time because the Tories were just as keen to invade Iraq. And Brown doesn't seem much like the guy to spunk billions on another war, so that's a moot point.)
Just look at the USA, they've (quite possibly, this is just a hypothesis) fucked themselves by invading Iraq, they've tried to promote "stability in the region" by eliminating an enemy, sounds great but they have merely destabilised the region even further, whilst laying first dibs on Iraqi oil. Securing supplies, perhaps, but for how long? And even if they DO get a real grip on Iraq over the next 5 years, I don't see that they can possibly draw enough oil out of the Iraqi wells and embezzle enough money to make it worthwhile for the US in the long term. Surely the ongoing costs of the war far outweigh the benefits? But perhaps the US is just too far gone down the road of global domination now, since oil is now worth more than their own people, and all they care about is the black stuff.