Quest Cyberfunk wrote:so let me get this right.. someone spouts absolute lies and unfounded allegations
Except that most of the incidents alluded to by Jemo turned out to have happened after all, as you have admitted in subsequent posts once things were further clarified (e.g. the leaflet incident). You had a very different recollection of the same events, which is fair enough, but it turns out they weren't "absolute lies" after all. It seems the one specific claim that is still in dispute between you is the "council tax" comment. However, your rebuttal of this and other claims are now a matter of record, so maybe we should leave it at that.
Quest Cyberfunk wrote:i'm not allowed to defend myself?
You were "allowed" to defend yourself several times. I had no issue with that. I do have an issue with the tone of your posts and the unnecessary personal abuse towards Jemo. A simple statement that these incidents didn't happen would have sufficed.
Quest Cyberfunk wrote: I actually feel sorry for you too that an admin needs to get childish and personal
Look who's talking.
Quest Cyberfunk wrote:with the other unfounded comments..
I'll leave it up those individuals to back up those comments if they wish.
Quest Cyberfunk wrote:I have extremly thickskin
*cough*
Quest Cyberfunk wrote:thanks and i'm done here
So be it. Mind the door doesn't bump your arse...




on fairly small forum really represent? Jem's comments werent even commented on by the other members of this board, so its not like he was in the process of starting the 'lets hate Quest' club. Jem is a really good friend of mine and I hate to see him slagged off in such a vicious fashion over something so silly 